Bibliography
    Alston, W., 1991, Perceiving God. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. Angell, R., 1974, ‘The Geometry of Visibles.’ Nous, 8: 87-117. Armstrong, D., 1978, Nominalism and Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bach, K., 2004, ‘Getting a Thing into A Thought.’ http://online.sfsu.edu/~kbach/ Beebee, H., 2003, ‘Seeing Causing.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 103: 25780. Belot, G., 2003, ‘Remarks on the Geometry of Visibles.’ Philosophical Quarterly, 53: 581-586. Berkeley, B., 1965, Berkeley’s Philosophical Writings, ed. D. Armstrong. London: Collier-Macmillan. Berkeley, B., 1975, Philosophical Works, ed. M. Ayers. London: Dent. Bermudez, J., 1998, The Paradox of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Block, N., 1996, ‘Mental Paint and Mental Latex’ in E. Villanueva, ed. Philosophical Issues 7: Perception: 19-49. Bonevac, D., 2002, ‘Sellars vs. the Given.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 64: 1-30. Brandom, R., 1994, Making It Explicit. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Brewer, B., 1999. Perception and Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    
    1
    
    Brewer, B., 2006, ‘How To Account for Illusion’, at http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/philosophy/staff/brewer/ Burge, T., 2003, ‘Perceptual Entitlement.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67: 503-548. Byrne, A., 2001, ‘Intentionalism Defended.’ The Philosophical Review, 110: 199-240. Campbell, J., 1997, ‘A Simple View of Colour’ in Readings on The Philosophy of Colour, eds. Byrne and Hilbert. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Campbell, J., 1994, Past, Space and Self. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Chalmers, D., 2005, ‘Perception and the Fall from Eden’, in Perceptual Experience, eds. Hawthorne and Gendler. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crane, T., 1988, ‘The waterfall illusion.’ Analysis 48: 142–147. Cussins, A., 1991, ‘The Connectionist Constructionist of Concepts’, in Readings on The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence, ed. M. Boden. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Davidson, D., 2001, Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Descartes, R., 1993, Meditations on First Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. Dummett, M., 1976, ‘What is a Theory of Meaning (II)?’ in Truth and Meaning, eds. G. Evans and J. McDowell. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dummett, M., 1978, ‘Wang’s Paradox’, in Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth. Evans, G., 1982, The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Evans, G., and McDowell, J., 1976, Truth and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    
    2
    
    Fodor, J., 1984, ‘Observation Reconsidered.’ Philosophy of Science, 51: 21-43. Goodman, N., 1976, Languages of Art. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. Gordon, R., 1996, “‘Radical’ Simulationism” in P. Carruthers and P. Smith, eds., Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Guyer, P., 2004. ‘Kant, Immanuel’, in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E. Craig. London: Routledge. Heck, R., 2000. ‘Nonconceptual Content and the ‘Space of Reasons.’’ The Philosophical Review, 109: 483-522. Hopkins, R., 1973, ‘Visual Geometry.’ The Philosophical Review, vol. 82: 3-34. Hume, D., 1978, A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. P. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jeshion, R., 2006, ‘Soames on Descriptive Reference-Fixing.’ Philosophical Issues, 16: 120-140. Kant, I., 1929, Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Norman-Kemp Smith. Houndmills: Palgrave. Lee, G., 2004, ‘Reply to Price.’ Columbia/NYU Graduate Philosophy Conference. Lewis, D., 1979, ‘Attitudes De Dicto and De Se.’ The Philosophical Review, 88: 513543. Lewis, D., 1980, ‘Veridical Hallucination and Prosthetic Vision.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 58: 239-249. Lewis, D., 1999, ‘Individuation by Acquaintance and by Stipulation’ in Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    
    3
    
    Lucas, J., 1969, ‘Euclides ab omni naevo vindicatus.’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 20: 1-11. McDowell, J., 1994, Mind and World. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. McDowell, J., 1998a, ‘Précis of Mind and World.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 365-368. McDowell, J., 1998b, Meaning, Knowledge and Reality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. McGinn, C., 1982, The Character of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mackie, J., 1999, The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. McNaughton, D., 1988, Moral Vision. Oxford: Blackwell. Mill, J.S., 1875, ‘Bailey on Berkeley’s Theory of Vision’ in his Dissertations and Discussion, vol. 2. London: Longmans, Green, and Dyer. Millar, A., 2000. ‘The Scope of Perceptual Knowledge.’ Philosophy, 75: 75-88. O’Regan, J. K. and Noe, A., 2001, ‘A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24: 939-1011. O’Shaughnessy, B., 1980, The Will. Volume 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Peacocke, C., 1983. Sense and content : experience, thought, and their relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Peacocke, C., 1992, A Study Of Concepts. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Peacocke, C., 2001. ‘Does Perception Have a Nonconceptual Content.’ Journal of Philosophy, 98: 239-264. Peacocke, C., 2003, The Realm of Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    
    4
    
    Pollock, J., forthcoming, ‘Perceptual Representation’, in Epistemology: New Essays, ed. Quentin Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, available at http://oscarhome.soc-sci.arizona.edu/ftp/PAPERS/Perceptual-representation.pdf Price, H., 1950, Perception. London: Methuen. Price, R, 2005, ‘Content Ascriptions and the Reversibility Constraint.’ Philosophical Perspectives, 19: 353-374. Proust, J., 2003, ‘Perceiving Intentions’, in Agency and Self-Awareness: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology, eds. J. Roessler and N. Eilan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Putnam, H., 1962, ‘What Theories are Not’ Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, eds. Ernest Nagel, Patrick Suppes, and Alfred Tarski. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Quine, W. V. O., 1956, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes.’ Journal of Philosophy, 53: 177-186. Reid, T., 2000, An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Searle, J., 1983, Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sellars, W., 1997, Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Shoemaker, S., 1994, ‘Self-knowledge and “inner-sense”.’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54: 249-314. Siegel, S., 2006, ‘Which Properties Are Represented in Perception?’, in Perceptual Experience, eds. T. Gendler-Szabo and J. Hawthorne. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    
    5
    
    Smith, D., 2000, ‘Space and Sight.’ Mind, 109: 481-518. Smith, D., 2002, The Problem of Perception. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Soames, S., 2003, Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century. Volume 2: The Age of Meaning. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Soames, S., 2005, Reference and Description. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Strawson, P. F., 1966, The Bounds of Sense. London: Routledge. Strawson, P. F., 1974a, ‘Imagination and Perception’, in Freedom and Resentment. London: Methuen. Strawson, P. F., 1974b, ‘Causation in Perception, in Freedom and Resentment. London: Methuen. Thau, M., 2002, Consciousness and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press. Thompson, B., 2006, ‘The Spatial Content of Experience’, available at http://faculty.smu.edu/bthompso/papers.html Tye, M., 2005, ‘On the Nonconceptual Content of Experience.’ M. E. Reicher, J. C. Marek (Eds.), Experience and Analysis. 221-239. Wien: öbv&hpt, 2005. Van Cleve, J., 2002, ‘Thomas Reid’s Geometry of Visibles.’ The Philosophical Review, 111: 373-416. Waldvogel, J.A., 1990, ‘The Bird's Eye View.’ American Scientist, 78: 342-353. Williamson, T., 2000, Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wittgenstein, L., 1958, The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Blackwell. Yaffe, G., 2002, ‘Reconsidering Reid’s Geometry of Visibles.’ Philosophical Quarterly, 52: 602-620.
    
    6
    
    Zangwill, N., 2004, ‘The myth of religious experience.’ Religious Studies, 40: 1-22.
    
    7

Add Comment

To add a comment, you need to login or signup (you can signup without leaving this page)